Ballasted Track And Non-Ballasted Track IntroductionThe basic argument for different track designs will be based on the bottom line-cost, cost of installation and cost of maintenance. There are however, other issues such as environment - noise, dust and vibration-or engineering issues such as space, location, climate and the type of service intended for the track.
The ability of ballast to allow track realignment is one of its most serious weaknesses. The lateral movement caused by passing trains on curved track is one of the major causes of maintenance costs added to which is the crushing caused by axle weight and damage due to weather and water. Ballast damage leads to tracks "pumping" as a train passes and, eventually, steel rail or rail sleeper damage will occur, to say nothing of the reduced comfort inside the train and the additional wear on rolling stock. Apart from regular repacking or "tamping", ballast will have to be cleaned or replaced every few years.
Another aspect to the ballasted track design, is the dust which is caused during installation and as it wears or gets crushed. It does however, offer a useful sound deadening quality.
Fixed track formations using slab track or a concrete base of some sort do not suffer from such problems. However, the installation of slab track is reported to cost about 20% more than ballasted track. To balance this cost, the maintenance costs have been quoted as reduced by 3 to 5 times that of ballasted track on a high-speed line in Japan.
Get In Touch
We receive enquiries in English, Español (Spanish), Русский язык (Russian), Français (French) and العربية (Arabic). Our professional team will reply to you within one business day. Please feel FREE to contact us!